Sunday, 1 June 2008

Hackney's Mayor Pipe smears children's laureate

Hackney Mayor Pipe’s public smear of the distinguished local writer and broadcaster Michael Rosen, for criticising the way Dalston is being redeveloped, is symptomatic of the Council’s deafness, even intolerance, of any views but its own. You can read the story here and here.

Mayor Pipe may well feel a warm glow of satisfaction and self-belief as he surveys his multi-million pound Hackney Town Hall Square. But from his offices he also sees the grand old Central Library which has been gutted and regenerated as the £30 million Ocean. Sadly it has since been closed for longer than it has been opened. Perhaps he can now feel proud that the Clissold Leisure Centre, following a £40 million overspend, has finally reopened .

Unfortunately Mayor Pipe has lavished no such care and expense on Dalston. Indeed, to help pay for these £70million “flagship” extravagances our desperate for cash Council auctioned off its once thriving Georgian terraces to absentee landlords, over the heads of its Council lessees. In Dalston we have since witnessed evictions, arson attacks and total dereliction.

OPEN has previously written here about the history. OPEN has campaigned for the compulsory purchase of the houses and for the Council to sell them on with conditions for refurbishment. We are told its Cabinet will finally consider this proposal in July. But the only outcome so far of the Council’s too little, too late “conservation led regeneration” policies has been the costly demolition of three more Georgian houses in Dalston Lane paid for from the public purse. Just what the landlord wanted.

But that is not an isolated example of Hackney’s municipal vandalism. Just up the road at Dalston Junction we had a similar story – the removal of roofs, the eviction of thriving businesses, then years of neglect, dereliction and finally the demolition of Dalston’s historic buildings on Mayor Pipe’s orders. Orders initially given before even planning permission and Cabinet approval had been obtained (see here for the story). Under construction now are the 20-storey towerblocks needed to pay for Transport for London’s new bus turnaround which is to be built above the reopened Dalston Junction overground station.

All in the name of “best value”, “attracting a critical mass of better off people”, “regeneration” and the 2012 Olympics.

Mayor Pipe commented that the choices for Dalston were made “with the best interests of the borough at heart”. Why then are Hackney residents subsidising the £39 million concrete slab needed for Transport for London’s bus turnaround? To sweeten this pill, just before the planning application and the later Mayoral elections, the authorities trumpeted the arrival of “The Tube” for Dalston - which TfL and Mayor Pipe now admit it is not.

The deal which Mayor Pipe and his officers negotiated for Dalston was so unfavourable that he had to obtain the Secretary of State’s approval to dispose of the Council’s site at undervalue.

Had “best value” been obtained we might instead have seen 258 (50%) not 58 new homes affordable to local people; quality buildings of appropriate scale rather than children living up to the 20th storey in towers blotting out the sunlight; some affordable space not just chain stores which take their profits elsewhere and drive up local rents. We might have seen some of Dalston’s character and diverse cultural history retained rather than a cloned shopping mall.

We could have seen local people involved and committed to the change instead, as is so often the case, feeling alienated, powerless and resentful. Michael Rosen’s anger at the authorities’ treatment of Dalston is shared by very many local people of all political, economic, ethnic and social groupings. For Mayor Pipe to describe those who disagree with him, by calling them the “Keep Hackney Crap” brigade, is a crude smear.

1 comment:

  1. I would like to take Jules Pipe for a meal at the Ganges, on Dalston Lane and when he gets there, he should let the owners have a chat to him about who they think had kept Hackney crap. For a start, they were told by LBH to come to an auction of Dalston Lane properties so that they could buy the derelict shop adjacent to theirs. When they got there, they found that there was a deal already in place. The 14 shops up for sale had been put into one lot and were sold to one buyer, an offshore or nominally offshore property developer. Since that time, (two years, three years ago? ) the properties have continued to deteriorate. As I eat at the Ganges or get my takeaways there (excellent food, by the way), I've followed the appalling catalogue of problems faced by the Ganges people. For a while there was an open main flooding the place, it became an unofficial public toilet and at least two of the properties have been torched. The Ganges itself has now been ruined from the property next door due to the damp coming through. Their ceiling has fallen in, the false wall they put between the restaurant and the party wall has become wet.

    Yes, Mr Pipes, come down and explain to the Ganges people how you believe in safeguarding Hackney's historic buildings, and how you are creating a bright new shiny Hackney. Explain how precisely in the midst of a credit crunch and a massive housing and building slump, your sums add up and why Barratts will finish the job and why Barratts et al will sell all the properties they're building.


Please leave comments that will add to the debate! We will not publish comments which are abusive or repetitive.

If we do not publish your comment and you are unhappy, please email with your contact details.